integrally

answer Answers

ProphetesAI is thinking...

MindMap

Loading...

Sources

1
integrally
integrally, adv. (ˈɪntɪgrəlɪ) [f. as prec. + -ly2. Cf. med.L. integrāliter entirely, wholly.] a. In an integral manner; as a whole, in its entirety; completely, entirely, wholly.1471 Ripley Comp. Alch. ii. v. in Ashm. (1652) 136 When the Erth ys integrally yncynerat. 1649 Jer. Taylor Gt. Exemp. ii. ... Oxford English Dictionary
prophetes.ai 0.0 3.0 0.0
2
Integrally closed
ring is said to be integrally closed in if is equal to the integral closure of in . An integral domain is said to be integrally closed if it is equal to its integral closure in its field of fractions. wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org 0.0 1.5 0.0
3
integrally
integrally/-grəlɪ; -ɡrəlɪ/ adv. 牛津英汉双解词典
prophetes.ai 0.0 0.90000004 0.0
4
Integrally convex set
Therefore X is not integrally convex. In contrast, the set Y = { (0,0), (1,0), (2,0), (1,1), (2,1) } is integrally convex. Properties Iimura, Murota and Tamura have shown the following property of integrally convex set. Let be a finite integrally convex set. wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org 0.0 0.6 0.0
5
Integrally closed domain
A completely integrally closed domain is integrally closed. Conversely, a noetherian integrally closed domain is completely integrally closed. A direct limit of integrally closed domains is an integrally closed domain. wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org 0.0 0.6 0.0
6
Integrally Closed implies reduced Suppose $A$ is a commutative ring with unit and that $A$ is integrally closed in $A[x]$. Show that $A$ is reduced?
Thus $p(x)$ is an integral element of $A[x]\setminus A$, which implies $A$ is not integrally closed in $A[x]$, which is what we wanted.
prophetes.ai 0.0 0.3 0.0
9
Overring of an integrally closed domain that is not integrally closed > Assume that $A$ is an integrally closed integral domain, and $K$ is its fraction field. Is every overring of $A$ between $A$ and $K$ also integra...
To show that $A$ is integrally closed notice that $A\subset K[X,Y]$, and the last ring is integrally closed. Clearly $R$ is not integrally closed since $X$ is integral over $R$ and $X\notin R$.
prophetes.ai 0.0 0.3 0.0
10
$R_1\subsetneq R_2$ integral domains, $R_1$ integrally closed. Is $R_2$ integrally closed? > Let $R_1\subset R_2$ be integral domains (i.e., commutative rings with unit without zero divisors). > > Suppose $R_1, R_2$ ...
Here is a counterexample: Let $S_{1},S_{2} \subset \mathbb{Z}^{\oplus 2}$ be the submonoids $S_{1} := \mathbb{N} \cdot (0,1) + \mathbb{N} \cdot (1,0)$ and $S_{2} := \\{\mathbb{N} \cdot (-1,1) + \mathbb{N} \cdot (1,0)\\} \setminus \\{(-1,1)\\}$ and let $R_{i} := \mathbb{Z}[S_{i}]$ be the monoid algeb...
prophetes.ai 0.0 0.3 0.0
11
When is an integrally closed local domain a valuation ring? Every valuation ring is an integrally closed local domain, and the integral closure of a local ring is the intersection of all valuation rings containing it....
Now the following is true: the local integrally closed domain $R$ is a valuation domain if and only if $R$ is coherent and there exist $r,s\in R$, $s\not
prophetes.ai 0.0 0.0 0.0
13
$2$-dimensional Noetherian integrally closed domains are Cohen-Macaulay Any 1-dimensional Noetherian domain is Cohen-Macaulay (C-M). > For the $2$-dimensional case, a condition of being integrally closed is necessar...
If $R$ is integrally closed, then $R$ is Cohen-Macaulay. From Serre's normality criterion we have that $R$ satisfies $(R_1)$ and $(S_2)$. $k[x^4,x^3y,xy^3,y^4]$ is $2$-dimensional, _not_ Cohen-Macaulay and _not_ integrally closed.
prophetes.ai 0.0 0.0 0.0
14
Prove that GCD domain is integrally closed In the case $R$ is a UFD, the proof of that $R$ is integrally closed essentially uses a key fact: If gcd($a,b)=1$, then gcd$(a^n,b)=1$. The proof of this relies on UFD prop...
$\color{#0a0}{(a,b)=1}\,=\,(c,\,b)\,\Rightarrow\,\color{#c00}1 = (a,b)(c,b) = (ac,ab,bb,bc)= (ac,\color{#0a0}{(a,b},c)b) = \color{#c00}{(ac,b)},\ $ therefore $\color{}{(a,b)=1}=(a^n,b)\,\Rightarrow\,\color{#c00}{1=(a^{n+1},b)}\ $ yields the induction step.
prophetes.ai 0.0 0.0 0.0
15
Finite extension of integrally closed ring again integrally closed Let $S\subset R$ be a finite ring extension, i.e. $R$ is finitely generated as an $S$-module. Assume that $S$ is integrally closed. Does this imply th...
Then $R$ is f.g. over $S$ (in fact free of rank $2$) but now $R$ is not integrally closed: The quotient field of $R$ is $\Bbb{Q}(\sqrt{-3})$ and $ \frac
prophetes.ai 0.0 0.0 0.0