ProphetesAI is thinking...
formular
Answers
MindMap
Loading...
Sources
FORMULAR definition in American English - Collins Dictionary
noun 1. a model or set form adjective 2. of or relating to formulas 3. formal Collins English Dictionary.
www.collinsdictionary.com
www.collinsdictionary.com
formular - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
See also: Formular, formulär, and formulář. Contents. 1 English. 1.1 Etymology; 1.2 Adjective. 1.2.1 Derived terms. 2 Catalan. 2.1 Pronunciation; 2.2 Verb.
en.wiktionary.org
en.wiktionary.org
German-English translation for "Formular" - Langenscheidt
Translation for 'Formular' using the free German-English dictionary by LANGENSCHEIDT -– with examples, synonyms and pronunciation.
en.langenscheidt.com
en.langenscheidt.com
formular
formular, a. and n. (ˈfɔːmjʊlə(r)) [ad. L. type *formulār-is, f. formula. As n., a. F. formulaire. See -ar1, -ar2.] A. adj. 1. Formal, correct or regular in form.1773 Johnson in Boswell 29 Apr., A speech on the stage, let it flatter ever so extravagantly, is formular. It has always been formular to ...
Oxford English Dictionary
prophetes.ai
Formular - Brownfox
Unlike its dogmatic Modernist predecessors, Formular is a hip Swiss sans serif of the new generation. Inspired by the utilitarian 19th-century grotesques, its ...
brownfox.org
brownfox.org
Formular stationery - Wikipedia
The term formular (often misspelled formula) is an adjective applied to envelopes, cards and aerograms, etc., produced by postal authorities or to their ...
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Formular Column Displaying Percentages
Jul 17, 2023 — Click the overall calculation field at the bottom of the group to open a customization panel, and select the percentage ...
community.monday.com
FORMULAR definition - Cambridge Dictionary
to create or prepare a plan or system carefully and in detail; formulate [verb] to express an idea or opinion in carefully chosen words.
dictionary.cambridge.org
dictionary.cambridge.org
"FORMULAR": A prescribed form or method - OneLook
adjective: following or relating to a formula; formulaic Similar: formulistic, formularistic, formulational, formulatory, formalist, formal, well-formed, ...
www.onelook.com
www.onelook.com
formular, adj. & n. meanings, etymology and more | Oxford English ...
The earliest known use of the word formular is in the mid 1500s. OED's earliest evidence for formular is from 1563, in a letter by William Cecil, ...
www.oed.com
www.oed.com
FORMULER | Home
Formuler specializes in the development, design, production, and support of digital broadcast receivers. Current models: Android OTT, 4K Android HYBRID, ...
www.formuler.tv
www.formuler.tv
Formular stationery
Formular stationery require the addition of an adhesive stamp before posting. References
External links
Formular Postal Stationery of Luxembourg
Postal stationery
Philatelic terminology
Envelopes
wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Derivative with constant in the denominator I have the formular $\frac{d(y(t)*a)}{d(t*b)}$ with a and b being constants, which can be changed to $\frac{a}{b}\frac{d(y(t))}{d(t)}$. My question is why this is possible?...
Write $w=y(t)a$ and $z=tb$. Then $$\frac{dw}{dt}=a\frac{d(y(t))}{dt}.$$ Since $t=\frac{z}{b}$, we get $$\frac{dt}{dz}=\frac{1}{b}.$$ Hence, $$\frac{d(y(t)a)}{d(tb)}=\overbrace{\frac{dw}{dz}=\frac{dw}{dt}\cdot\frac{dt}{dz}}^{\text{Chain Rule}}=a \frac{d(y(t))}{dt}\cdot\frac{1}{b}=\frac{a}{b}\cdot\fra...
prophetes.ai
how to prove the convolution formular? let $\overset{\backsim} {g}(x)=g(-x)$; suppose $u,\phi,\psi$ always make the integral significant,$E_n$ is the n-dimensional euclidean space. Then how to prove $\int_{E_n}(u*\p...
We have \begin{align*} \int_{E_n} (u * \phi)(x)\psi(x)\, dx &= \int_{E_n} \int_{E_n} u(y)\phi(x-y)\, dy\,\psi(x)\, dx\\\ &= \int_{E_n} \int_{E_n} u(y)\phi(x-y)\psi(x)\, dx\, dy\\\ &= \int_{E_n} u(y) \int_{E_n} \overset\backsim\phi(y-x)\psi(x)\,dx\, dy\\\ &= \int_{E_n} u(y)(\overset\backsim\phi * \ps...
prophetes.ai
what is the explicit form of this iterativ formular I am not sure, if there is an explicit form, but if there is, how do I get it? This is the formula: $$c_n=\frac{1-n \cdot c_{n-1}}{\lambda}$$ where $\lambda \in \m...
The expression for $c_n$ is $$c_n=\frac{(-1)^n n!}{\lambda^{n+1}}\left\\{S_{n}(-\lambda)+\lambda c_0-1\right\\}$$ where \begin{equation}S_n(x)=\sum_{k=0}^n\frac{x^k}{k!} \end{equation} for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$. I prove it inductively. For $n=1$ the proposed expression begets $$-\frac{1}{\lambda^2}...
prophetes.ai