ProphetesAI is thinking...
cæcal
Answers
MindMap
Loading...
Sources
cæcal
cæcal, a. Phys. (ˈsiːkəl) [f. cæc-um + -al1.] Pertaining to, or of the nature of, the cæcum; having a blind end.1826 Kirby & Sp. Entomol. IV. xl. 121 Their cæcal appendages are numerous. 1858 Lewes Sea-side Studies Index, Cæcal prolongations of the intestines are..ramifications without openings at t...
Oxford English Dictionary
prophetes.ai
C. Cal Evans
C. Cal Evans was born May 23, 1905, to Elijah Charles Evans and Sarah Elizabeth McConnaughey. Mayor C. Cal Evans lost to Arthur Selland in a field of eight candidates.
wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
$F^{op}$ functor I'm trying to make sens of category theory. In my course it is stated that a functor is a map $$F:{\cal{C}}\rightarrow{\cal{D}}:X\mapsto F(X)$$ and which sends $f\in \text{Hom}_{\cal{C}}(X,Y)$ to $Ff\...
Let $F:\mathcal C\to \mathcal C$ be the identity functor on this category. Now your concern is valid -- there's no functor $\mathcal C^\text{op}\to \mathcal C$ that remains the identity on objects but reverses the arrow, simply
prophetes.ai
Is every sigma algebra generated by some subclass. Let $\Omega$ a non empty set and consider and $\cal{A}$ a sigma algebra in $\Omega$. Is there always a set $\cal{C}\subset\mathscr{P}(\Omega)$, $\cal{C}$ strictly con...
If you take $\mathcal{C}=\mathcal A$, then you'll have a set that generates $\mathcal A$. If you want a smaller set, take $\mathcal{C}=\mathcal{A}\setminus\\{\emptyset\\}$.
prophetes.ai
Construct a projection satisfying a certain property > Let $\cal G$ be a group of finite order $n$. For every prime divisor $p$ of $n$, construct a projection $P\in \cal N(G)$ such that $\operatorname{tr}_{\cal N(G)}(...
If $g$ is an element of order $p$ (this always exists by Cauchy's Theorem), let $$ Q=\frac1p\,\sum_{j=0}^{p-1} g^j. $$ Then $\text{tr}(Q)=1/p$ and $$ Q^*=\frac1p\,\left(\sum_{j=0}^{p-1} g^j\right)^*=\frac1p\,\sum_{j=0}^{p-1} g^{-j} =\frac1p\,\sum_{j=0}^{p-1} g^{p-j}=\frac1p\,\sum_{k=1}^{p} g^k=\frac...
prophetes.ai
If $T \in \cal{L}(V)$ and every vector in $V$ is an eigenvector of $T$ then $T=cI$ for some $c \in \cal{F}$ Suppose $T$ is an operator on a vector space $V$ (i.e. a linear map from $V$ to itself) such that every vecto...
Choose a basis $B$ of $V$ and show that two members of $B$ have the same Eigenvalue: If $v_1,v_2\in B$ and $\lambda_1,\lambda_2$ are their Eigenvalues it follows: $T(v_1+v_2) = \lambda_1v_1 + \lambda_2v_2$ On the other hand $v_1+v_2$ ist an Eigenvector too. Also an Eigenvalue $\eta$ exists with $T(v...
prophetes.ai
Questions about multiplier algebra and corona algebra When I read N.E. Wegge-Olsen's book K-theory and C-star-algebras_ A friendly approach I meet the following two problems about standard isomophisms: 1. For any $...
For part 2, we just apply part 1, and the isomorphism given: $$ \mathbb{M}_2(\cal{C}(\cal{A}\otimes\cal{K(H)}))=\mathcal C(\mathbb{M}_2(\cal{A}\otimes\ cal{K(H)})\simeq \mathcal C(\cal{A}\otimes\cal{K(H)}) $$
prophetes.ai
Is a family of disjoints atoms in $\sigma$-finite neasurable space at most countable? Let $\mu$ be a positive measure on a $\sigma$-algebra $S$ in $X$. A subset $A\subset X$ is called an atom if $\mu(A)>0$ and for e...
Let $X = \cup_n E_n$, where $\mu(E_n) <+\infty$. Then $E_n$ being a finite measure space, can only intersect countably many of the atoms, by your own argument for finite measure spaces. So $X$ can also have at most countably many atoms in a family.
prophetes.ai
Comparability of topologies on $\Bbb R$ > Let $\cal C=\\{a,b):a<b; a,b\in \Bbb Q\\}$ be a basis for a topology on $\Bbb R$. [This says that topology generated by $\cal C$ is not comparable to the countable complement ...
From the fact that $\mathbb R-\mathbb Q$ is evidently not an element of $\tau(\mathcal C)$ (in contrast to non-empty elements in $\tau(\mathcal C)$ it does not contain an interval) it can be concluded that $\tau(\mathcal C)$ is not finer than the cocountable topology.
prophetes.ai
Boundary point sequence proof > Let $A\subset \mathbb{R}^p$ and $x\in \mathbb{R}^p$. Then $x$ is a boundary point of $A$ if and only if there is a sequence $(a_n)$ of elements in $A$ and a sequence $(b_n)$ of elements...
A similar argument applies to $A^c$.
Now choose $U_n = B(x,\frac{1}{n})$, and pick $a_n \in U_n \cap A$, $b_n \in U_n \cap A^c$. Similarly $b_n \in A^c$ and $b_n \to x$.
prophetes.ai
3-dim Lie algebra with two commutative elements Let $\cal g$ be a Lie algebra and let $a,b,c\in \cal g$ be such that $ab=ba$ and $[a,b]=c\not =0$. Let $\mathcal h=span\ \\{a,b,c\\}$. How to prove that $\mathcal h$ is ...
The Lie algebra with $[a,b]=c$ is the $3$-dimensional Heisenberg Lie algebra $\mathfrak{h}_1$. pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \\\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\\ \end{pmatrix}, \quad b = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\\ \end{pmatrix}, \quad c
prophetes.ai
Showing a functor has no right adjoint Let ${\cal C}$ be the category of groups. Let ${\cal C}'$ be the full subcategory of ${\cal C}$ with objects the class of abelian groups. Let $F$ be the inclusion of ${\cal C}'...
You are correct that abelianization is left adjoint to the forgetful/inclusion functor. If $F$ had a right adjoint, then $F$ would itself be a left adjoint, which would imply that it preserved colimits. The easiest way to show that $F$ has no right adjoint is to give an example of a colimit that is ...
prophetes.ai
Measure extension theorem(unique) Please give an example of two probability measures $\mu \not = \nu$ on $\cal{F} $= all subsets of {1, 2, 3, 4} that agree on a collection of sets C with $\sigma(C)=\cal{F}$ . thanks ...
Obviously, $C$ should _not_ be a $\pi$-system ( _do you know why?_ ). Let me provide some collection $C$ that works and let you find $\mu$ and $\nu$ (there are infinitely many such pairs): $$C=\\{\\{1,2\\},\\{1,3\\},\\{1,2,3,4
prophetes.ai
Let $(X, {\cal E}, \mu)$ be a measure space and let $B,C \in {\cal E}$. Show $\mu_B + \mu_C \leq \mu$. Let $(X, {\cal E}, \mu)$ be a measure space and let $B,C \in {\cal E}$. Define $\mu_B:{\cal E} \to [0,\infty]$ by ...
{B}$ and $\mathrm{C}.$ Hence, $\mu_{\mathrm{B}} + \mu_{\mathrm{C}} = \mu_{(\mathrm{B} \setminus \mathrm{C}) \cup (\mathrm{C} \setminus \mathrm{B})} \leq 2 \mu(\mathrm{B} \cap \mathrm{C}) \leq \mu(\mathrm{B} \cap \mathrm{C}),$ hence $\mu(\mathrm{B} \cap \mathrm{C}) = 0.$ Q.E.D.
prophetes.ai