ProphetesAI is thinking...
transitiveness
Answers
MindMap
Loading...
Sources
transitiveness
ˈtransitiveness [f. as prec. + -ness.] The quality or state of being transitive; in quot. 1845, transitoriness.1845 J. H. Newman Ess. Developm. 71 A belief in the transitiveness of worldly goods. 1850 A. de Morgan in Trans. Cambr. Philos. Soc. (1856) IX. i. 104 The first [copular condition] is what ...
Oxford English Dictionary
prophetes.ai
transitivity
transiˈtivity [f. late L. transitīv-us transitive + -ity.] = transitiveness: see transitive 2, 6 and 7.1891 Cent. Dict., Transitivity, the character of being transitive, as a group. 1897 Monist Jan. 211 Not only is the relative of correspondence transitive, but it also possesses what may be called a...
Oxford English Dictionary
prophetes.ai
Demetrius Kantakouzenos
This experience evidently left an indelible impression on him, and he became obsessed with the transitiveness of life and the power of death.
wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Transitiveness of set sizes Given that: $$|A|\le|B|<|C|$$ Prove that: $$|A|<|C|$$ * * * I proved that: $$|A|\le|C|$$ By showing a $1:1$ function from $A$ to $C$, in the following way: $$\exists f:A\to B, \exists g:B...
Suppose $f:A\to C$ is a surjection and let $g:A\to B$ be an injection. $g$ has a partial inverse $g^{-1}:g(A)\to A$ and then $f\circ g^{-1}:g(A)\to C$ is onto. If we arbitrarily extend $f\circ g^{-1}$ to $B$, then we get a surjection from $B$ onto $C$, contradiction.
prophetes.ai
How do you prove the transitiveness of xRy if 2 divides x + y The relation I have is xRy iff 2 | x + y on the set of positive integers (Z+) I intrinsically know that it is transitive, but I can't think of a way to ma...
assume that you have $xRy$ and $yRz$, and then prove that you also have $xRz$. because $xRy$ and $yRz$ then its says that $2 |(x+y)$ and also $2 |(y+z)$, then exists integers $m,k \in \Bbb Z^+$ s.t $$x+y = 2k\rightarrow x= 2k -y$$ and $$y+z=2m\rightarrow z=2m-y.$$ now, you can write that $$x+z = (2k...
prophetes.ai
Macedonian grammar
speaking Macedonian verbs have the following characteristics, or categories as they are called in the Macedonian studies: tense, mood, person, type, transitiveness
wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
transitive
transitive, a. (n.) (ˈtrɑːnsɪtɪv, ˈtræns-, -nz-) [ad. late L. transitīvus (Priscian), f. transit- (see transit) + -īvus, -ive; in F. transitif (16th c.). With sense 1 cf. OF. transitif transient (13th c. in Godef.).] † 1. Passing or liable to pass into another condition, changeable, changeful; passi...
Oxford English Dictionary
prophetes.ai
Minimal Transitive Closure Any binary relation over any set (finite or infinite) must has a transitive closure. Moreover, every binary relation must has a minimal transitive closure. Who proved this well-known result ...
Syllogism, and in particular of the Copula," _Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society_ , **9** , (1850) p. 104: "The first is what I shall call _transitiveness
prophetes.ai
intransitive
intransitive, a. (n.) (ɪnˈtrɑːnsɪtɪv, -æ-) [ad. L. intransitīvus not passing over (Priscian), f. in- (in-3) + trans-īre to pass over. Cf. F. intransitif.] 1. Gram. Of verbs and their construction: Expressing action which does not pass over to an object; not taking a direct object. (See transitive, n...
Oxford English Dictionary
prophetes.ai
を without a transitive verb? > I interpret this sentence's meaning as something like, "The letter ended up being seen by someone else." From what I understand, the verb is transitive, "to see." The verb should be...
This is the so-called "adversarial passive". I give a detailed explanation of passives (including the "adversarial" ones) here: > object marker in this {} sentence In your case: ⇓ **Active Sentence** : ⇓ ⇓ **Passive Sentence** : ⇓ That is to say, gets lifted to , and gets lifted to . As mentioned in...
prophetes.ai
Transitive closure of relation Let $R$ be a binary relation on set X. Let us define the transitive closure of $R$, denoted by $S_R$ as follows: $xS_Ry$, if $xRy$ or there exist $x_1,x_2,…, x_m\in X$ such that $xRx_1...
Therefore, for transitiveness, $a_0 S_R a_0$. Hence $S_R$ is not ireflexive.
prophetes.ai
What is wrong with the following "proof" that $\sim$ is reflexive? Let ~ be a symmetric and transitive relation on a set A. What is wrong with the folloing "proof" that $\sim$ is reflexive? > Proof: $a\sim b$ implie...
For example, the empty relation satisfies symmetry and transitiveness, but the lack of existence of something to "apply" them yields non-reflexivity.
prophetes.ai