peer review

answer Answers

ProphetesAI is thinking...

MindMap

Loading...

Sources

1
Peer review - Wikipedia
Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competencies as the producers of the work (peers). It functions as a form of ... en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org 0.0 10.0 0.0
2
What is Peer Review? - Wiley Author Services
Peer review is the process where experts from a specific field or discipline evaluate the quality of a peer's research. authorservices.wiley.com
authorservices.wiley.com 0.0 5.0 0.0
3
Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A ...
Peer review has been defined as a process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov 0.0 3.0 0.0
4
peer review
peer review orig. U.S. [f. peer n. + review n.] 1. The evaluation, by experts, in the relevant field, of a scientific research project for which a grant is sought.1971 Hastings Center Rep. i. June 3 (heading) Priorities, peer review and public policy. 1975 Nature 4 Dec. 382/1 At the heart of the inq... Oxford English Dictionary
prophetes.ai 0.0 3.0 0.0
5
Peer Review | The Higher Learning Commission
HLC's peer reviewers are expert volunteers who play an essential role in assuring the quality of our member institutions. www.hlcommission.org
www.hlcommission.org 0.0 2.0 0.0
6
AICPA Peer Review
Welcome to Peer Review! We are dedicated to enhancing the quality of accounting, auditing and attestation services performed by AICPA members in public ... peerreview.aicpa.org
peerreview.aicpa.org 0.0 2.0 0.0
7
Peer review (disambiguation)
Peer review may refer to: Clinical audit, a systematic review of healthcare against an explicit standard Clinical peer review, the process by which Peer Review, a DLC for Portal 2 Peer Review (magazine), an academic magazine Physician peer review, the process by which physicians evaluate each wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org 0.0 1.5 0.0
8
Meaning of "peer-reviewed" research : r/psychologystudents - Reddit
Peer review is a formal process implemented by many scientific journals. Journals will ask other experts or fellow researchers in the field to anonymously ... www.reddit.com
www.reddit.com 0.0 1.0 0.0
9
What is peer review? - Elsevier
Peer review helps validate research, establish a method by which it can be evaluated, and increase networking possibilities within research communities. www.elsevier.com
www.elsevier.com 0.0 1.0 0.0
10
Scrutinizing science: Peer review - Understanding Science
In science, peer review helps provide assurance that published research meets minimum standards for scientific quality. undsci.berkeley.edu
undsci.berkeley.edu 0.0 1.0 0.0
11
What Is A Peer-Reviewed Article? - Evaluating Information Sources
In academic publishing, the goal of peer review is to assess the quality of articles submitted for publication in a scholarly journal. lib.jjay.cuny.edu
lib.jjay.cuny.edu 0.0 1.0 0.0
12
Peer Review | Nature
The following types of contribution to Nature Portfolio journals are peer-reviewed: Articles, Letters, Brief Communications, Matters Arising, Technical Reports, Analysis, Resources, Reviews ...
www.nature.com 0.0 0.90000004 0.0
13
Peer Review Process | Wiley
The length of the peer review process varies by journal, so check with the editors or the staff of the journal to which you are submitting to for details of the process for that particular journal. Click here to read Wiley's review confidentiality policy and check the review model for each journal we publish.
authorservices.wiley.com 0.0 0.6 0.0
14
Open Peer Review - PLOS
In the life sciences, Open Peer Review is less established but is becoming increasingly normalized. For example, journals including Royal Society Open Science, Nature Communications, EMBO, eLife, and of course the PLOS journals, all offer forms of Open Peer Review. No matter the focus of your research, the odds are good that you'll be invited ...
plos.org 0.0 0.6 0.0
15
Frontiers | Peer review
Interactive review During the interactive review phase, authors and reviewers can interact with each other through real-time comments in the discussion forum - with the aim of addressing all concerns about the manuscript. The handling editor oversees the review process, and, if required, the specialty chief editor can also enter the review forum.
www.frontiersin.org 0.0 0.3 0.0