> It was my understanding that Cisco's ACS+ was EOL, which is why we were moving to ISE in the first place.
Somewhere there was a misunderstanding because Cisco ACS 5.6 is currently supported.
> Are you suggesting that we use ACS+ or are you saying ISE cannot perform accounting?
ISE is basically just a fancy RADIUS server, which is heavily focused on EAP / 802.1X. Save yourself pain and suffering, don't hammer the square peg (ISE) into a round hole (CLI accounting). Cisco ACS is designed for CLI accounting; ISE isn't.