The answer is negative. Assuming that $\phi(\mathbb{N})$ is a syndetic set we have that the totient numbers (i.e. the numbers that are of the form $\phi(n)$ for some $n$) have a positive lower asymptotic density, but Wikipedia contradicts that, giving us that the number of totient numbers up to $x$ is
$$ \frac{x}{\log x}\,\exp\left((C+o(1))\left(\log\log\log x\right)^2\right) $$ for some constant $C = 0.8178146\ldots$.
* * *
That asymptotic is very interesting, because it shows that the problem is more or less equivalent to the trivial one:
> Is the set of primes a syndetic set?
In such a case the answer is negative, since by considering primorials and by exploiting the PNT we have the existence of $k$ consecutive composite numbers less than $\exp((1+o(1))k)$.