Artificial intelligent assistant

Is jump intensity inaccurate in describing random process? In < Under the section of Poisson jump processes, it is said that **We may also define functions on discontinuous stochastic processes. Let h be the jump intensity. The Poisson process model for jumps is that the probability of one jump in the interval [t, t + Δt] is hΔt plus higher order terms.** How can I know what the higher order terms are? Is jump intensity not accurate/sufficient? For example, the higher order terms are $h(Δt)^3$, but the jump intensity hides that, so why do we still use jump intensity?

Jump intensity is sufficient to describe a Poisson process. The intuitive reason is because the Poisson process is memoryless. For a tiny fraction of time, there is a tiny probability $h\Delta t$ of jumping, and if it doesn't jump, the next instant of time is another independent trial. So only the leading order in $\Delta t$ matters since only the limit $\Delta t\rightarrow 0$ matters.

You can say things about longer intervals of time, but they're uniquely implied by the infinitessimal description. For instance, the number of jumps in a time period $T$ is Poisson distributed with mean $hT.$

I should add that this is not only true for Poisson processes. For instance, modulated poisson processes and jump diffusion also involve an instantaneous jump intensity... it just can change or fluctuate randomly in time. The key is that it gives a momentary infinitessimal probability of jumping (i.e. an instantaneous rate).

xcX3v84RxoQ-4GxG32940ukFUIEgYdPy d3cbb69a3dd6aea040d038305b3eee50