Artificial intelligent assistant

Constructing Logical Derivation All Texans speak to anyone whom they know intimately. No Texan speaks to anyone who is not a Southerner. Therefore, Texans know only southerners intimately. (We have to use These predicates : $Tx, Sxy,Kxy,Ux$). $Tx : x$ is a Texan. $Sxy : x$ speaks with $y$. $Kxy :x$ knows $y$. $Ux: x$ is a southerner. I can't symbolise these arguements, so question of constructing derivation is far. Please, just explain me in detalis how you would symbolise these arguements.

$\
ewcommand{T}{{\rm T}} \
ewcommand{S}{{\rm S}} \
ewcommand{K}{{\rm K}} \
ewcommand{U}{{\rm U}} \
ewcommand{and}{\text{ and }}$

> All Texans speak to anyone whom they know intimately.

Rephrase it as "If a x is a Texan, and if x knows y, then x speaks to y".

> $\forall x, y \quad \T x \and \K xy \Longrightarrow \S xy$

* * *

No Texan speaks to anyone who is not a Southerner.

Rephrase it as "If x is a Texan and if y is not a southerner, then x does not speak to y."

> $\forall x, y \quad \T x \and \lnot \U y \Longrightarrow \lnot S xy$

or if you wish to be advanced:

> $\bigg\vert\\{x ~\vert~ \T x \and \exists y ~ \lnot \U y \and \S x y\\}\bigg\vert = 0$

* * *

> Therefore, Texans know only southerners intimately.

Rephrase it as "If x is Texan, and x knows y, then y is a southerner."

> $\forall x, y \quad \T x \and \K xy \Longrightarrow U y$

* * *

To prove the 3rd rule using the first 2, transform the 2nd rule to it's contrapositive.

xcX3v84RxoQ-4GxG32940ukFUIEgYdPy cf8b9c68382960a818ef6ff2e5e63c8a