Artificial intelligent assistant

Constructing a bijection between $\xi$ and $\xi + 1$ I did the following exercise, can you tell me if I have it right, thank you (Just/Weese p 176): Show that $|\xi + 1|$ is either finite or equal to $|\xi|$. (here $\xi$ is an ordinal) * * * ~~By contradiction assume $\xi + 1$ is infinite and $|\xi + 1| >|\xi|$. ~~ For an infinite ordinal $S$ we can construct a bijection $f: S + 1 \to S $ as follows: Let $S + 1 = S \cup \\{\ast\\}$. Then define $\ast \mapsto s_0$ where $s_0 = \min S$ and $s \mapsto \min (S \setminus f[I(s)])$ where $I(s) = \\{s' \in S \mid s' < s\\} \cup \\{\ast\\}$ is the initial segment of $s$ together with the additional element.

It seems a bit convoluted. More simply you could say that if $\xi \ge \omega$ then you can define a bijection $f:\xi+1 \to \xi$ as follows:

* $f(\xi) = 0$
* If $\alpha \in \xi$ and $\alpha < \omega$ then $f(\alpha)=\alpha+1$
* If $\alpha \in \xi$ and $\alpha \ge \omega$ then $f(\alpha) = \alpha$



This is very similar to what you did. Essentially, it puts the top element to $0$ and increments all the naturals, and leaves everything else fixed.

* * *

On the point of style: you could have cut off your entire first sentence and started the proof with "For an infinite ordinal $S$ ...". It's an example of the classic $$\text{[Suppose not X]}-\text{[Proof of X]}-\text{[Therefore not not X]}$$ when just $\text{[Proof of X]}$ would have sufficed.

xcX3v84RxoQ-4GxG32940ukFUIEgYdPy c1e9fa29c32a6899d847787b47132b62