This is a specific case of $G$-paradoxical, for a group $G$. The basic idea is that a set $Y$ is $G$ paradoxical if it can be partitioned into two distinct subsets such that the action of $G$ on the subsets gives something that looks like the original set back. This is the core concept underlying both paradoxes that you named.
You can read the formal definition at the bottom of the first page here.