Is "indeterminate" a better name than "indifferent" for neutral fixed-points? let $f(t)=t$ be an analytic function which has a fixed-point at $t$. The multiplier $\lambda (t) = f'(t)$ is just the 1st derivative evaluated at the fixed-point. The standard nomenclature is that when $\| \lambda (t) \|=1$ the fixed-point is said to be indifferent, or neutral. However, it does not necessarily mean that trajectories can't be attracted or repelled by this point, only that its 1st derivative equals 1. Wouldn't "indeterminate" be a better name than "indifferent" ? The function $(1 / ( 1 - \| \lambda (t) \| ) )$ is ill-defined when $\lambda(t) = 1$

Perhaps a matter of opinion, but "indeterminate" should mean that its type cannot be determined, while "indifferent" should mean that its type can be any. Right?

From this point of view, although it is only language, it seems better to use "indifferent" since clearly the type of a fixed point will definitely be well defined, **for each specific dynamics**.

On the other hand, it also common to use "parabolic" (and in my opinion much better) in opposition to "hyperbolic". The latter (usually) means that $|f'(t)|\
e1$.