Why a decimal fraction is not expressing exactly what a rational number is in base 2? I am currently using rational numbers to express currency and math operations with currency, while dealing with rational numbers has provided a great convenience in over coming the limitations of scaling integers into unit64 I have a few concerns around decimal fractions vs rational numbers and the quotient they express: Given the following rational number: $5764607523034235/576460752303423488$ this supposedly represents 0.01 'exactly', according to the 'quotToFloat' method found here: < but given the following decimal fraction: $1/100$ this supposedly does not represent 0.01 'exactly'. My concern lies in holding 2 different rational numbers that represent the same qoutient but not being able to find equality between them without converting them and comparing. Why is it that $1/100$ does not express 0.01 exactly? Am I butting up against base2 limitations?

Yes, you are up against base 2 limitations. It is the same as in base 10, you cannot represent $\frac 13=0.\overline 3$ exactly because it has a prime factor that does not divide $10$. $0.1_{10}=0.00011\overline{0011}_2$. It is a repeating "decimal" because of the factor $5$ in the denominator. Why are you using quotToFloat? It looks like your package has exact rationals, so you can just subtract them and check whether the difference is zero for equality.