In fact the your set function is a measure in that sigma algebra.
Indeed let $\\{A_n:n \in \Bbb{N}\\}$ disjoint.
If all are countable then their countable union is countable so $$\mu(\bigcup_n A_n)=0=\sum_n\mu(A_n)$$
If some $A_m$ is uncountable then $A_n \subseteq A_m^c, \forall n \
eq m$ and by definition of the sigma algebra $A_m^c$ is countable.
So $\mu(A_n)=0 ,\forall n\
eq m$ and $\mu(A_m)=1$
Since $(\bigcup_nA_n)^c \subseteq A_m^c$ we have that $\mu(\bigcup_nA_n)=1=\sum_n\mu(A_n)$
If $\\{A_n\\}_{n \in \Bbb{N}}$ is any countable collection of pairwise disjoint sets in the sigma algebra, then it can contain at most one uncountable set because if $A_n,A_m$ are two disjoint uncountable sets, then $A^c_n,A^c_m$ are countable, so $A^c_n\cup A^c_m$ is countable, and thus $A_n \cap A_m=(A^c_n \cup A^c_m)^c$ is uncountable thus non-empty, which is a contradiction,since the sets are assumed disjoint.