Yes, your second approach is correct. In the first approach, I'm not sure exactly how you got the $6$ to be the constant, and you would not be using half-life but rather $e$ as the exponential base. Not quite what you want. Also, when taking the natural logarithm of both sides, the $6$ disappeared. But yes, the approach you took the second time is correct, but I would suggest using the exact value instead of $-0.28$ and use $\frac{\ln(2)}{24.5}$ to avoid round-off.