The single bracket `[` is actually an alias for the `test` command, it's _not_ syntax.
One of the downsides (of many) of the single bracket is that if one or more of the operands it is trying to evaluate return an empty string, it will complain that it was expecting two operands (binary). This is why you see people do `[ x$foo = x$blah ]`, the `x` guarantees that the operand will never evaluate to an empty string.
The double bracket `[[ ]]`, on the other hand, _is syntax_ and is much more capable than `[ ]`. As you found out, it does not have the "missing operand" issue and it also allows for more C-like syntax with `>, <, >=, <=, !=, ==, &&, ||` operators.
My recommendation is the following: If your interpreter is `#!/bin/bash`, then _always_ use `[[ ]]`
It is important to note that `[[ ]]` is not supported by all POSIX shells, however many shells do support it such as `zsh` and `ksh` in addition to `bash`