Multiple "wo"s in a sentence? I had always been told this never happened. I was a little skeptical, but since I never saw a sentence with two of the particle, I gradually came to accept that it was probably true. Well ironically, in the DoBJG, where I'm pretty sure I've also read the above factoid, I've encountered this sentence: So I'm wondering if this is a mistake, or a weird exception, or if this "rule" I've heard is simply misleading or outright fallacious, and if so, when is it okay to use multiple wo particles in a sentence. Cheers.

This is a simple case of subclauses - you've still got one per clause:

[[]]

is the object of , is the object* of .

*Depending on your interpretation of with what you would think are intransitive verbs. You can read more about these sorts of cases here: It seems that is categorized as (intransitive verb), yet it is frequently used with . Why?