Any witness of $\omega$-inconsistency of ZFC can be effectively transformed to a witness of $\omega$-inconsistency of ZF as follows. Suppose $\phi(x)$ is a formula such that for each numeral $n$, ZFC proves $\phi(n)$ and also $(\exists x \in \omega)\
eg \phi(x)$. Let $\psi(x) = \phi^L(x)$ be obtained from $\phi(x)$ by restricting its quantifiers to $L$. Then for each numeral $n$, ZF proves $\psi(n)$ since ZFC theorems when relativized to $L$ are theorems of ZF. Also $L$ is transitive so $(\exists x \in L \cap \omega) \
eg \psi(x)$ is equivalent (in ZF) to $(\exists x \in \omega) \
eg \psi(x)$. Hence $\psi(x)$ witnesses the $\omega$-inconsistency of ZF.