The theory of "univalent functions" in complex analysis is all about univalent analytic functions. This particular author seems to want to separate the "injective" and "analytic" parts. I don't know why. So he might say that a function is "analytic and univalent" where someone else, for whom "analytic" is part of the definition of univalent, would just say "univalent". I don't know if he ever says anything about non-analytic one-to-one functions, which he might call "univalent", while the other author would just call it "injective".
But a little bit of terminological eccentricity is not a reason to discard the pdf.