Yes, I think you'd read it as:
>
>
>
>
for 5/7/5 like where the middle line can be split into 4+3(e.g.: ).
And you'd read it as:
>
>
>
>
for 5/7/5 like where the middle line sounds better when split into 3+4(e.g.: ).
And you'd probably read it as:
>
>
>
>
for 5/8/5, like 8/5/8/5/8/5... :D()