Who chooses the questions for review audit? I failed a highly debatable one This just happened to me: !enter image description here I tried to close it as off topic, as I personally don't believe this falls under system administration. For others it may be a grey area, but I think it belongs on either Stack Overflow or SuperUser. My judgement may be clouded, but the issue is that questions like these should never ever be selected for the review audit test.

Here's a meta.SO question about crappy review audits:

Clearly wrong close review audit - what action to take?

Questions for review audits are picked automatically and it's obvious from all the questions about them that they aren't always as clearly good or bad as they should be.

The official SE response seems to be:

* the audits are needed to deal with all the robo-reviewers
* the automatic question selection is best they can do
* if you fail the odd audit there are no repercussions
* if you did get review banned because of a series of bad audits, you could "appeal" it



Basically, they aren't planning on changing anything at this point, even in the case of possible duplicates, where they know the audit doesn't work properly:

Close vote review audit flawed - fails without casting vote

One of the comments mentions a bounty, there's a question specifically about that:

A reopen queue review audit shouldn't show me a question that has an active bounty